Hamish Stewart vs Charlie Robertson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to recent second serve performance, Stewart appears stronger, winning 47.21% of points compared to Robertson's 38.51%. Could this edge influence the match outcome? Likely, given the stat's predictive accuracy.
• In return game stats, Robertson outperforms Stewart by winning 48.21% of second serve return points, whereas Stewart manages 45.29%. However, for first serve return points, Robertson's 32.78% significantly exceeds Stewart’s 22.29%. This could suggest an advantage for Robertson in capitalizing on opponents' serves.
• Considering pressure situations, Stewart has been slightly better at saving breakpoints, excelling at a rate of 57.65% in comparison to Robertson’s 56.2%. Could this slight edge be crucial during match-defining moments?
• Looking at overall performance over the last year, Stewart has a decisive edge in win percentage, achieving 64.79% compared to Robertson’s 37.5%.
• Their preferred playing surface of I.hard favors both players, yet Stewart still holds a superior win rate of 68% over Robertson's 58% on this surface.
• Examining the tournament levels, Stewart has enjoyed more success in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.33% of their matches. Robertson’s corresponding win rate is only 45.45%, highlighting Stewart as the more consistent player at these event levels.
• Considering opponent quality, Robertson's adversaries had an average rank of 335.81, which suggests tougher competition compared to Stewart, whose rivals averaged a rank of 402.66.
• In high-stakes matches that go to a deciding set, Stewart shows stronger nerves, winning 56% of such sets, vastly outperforming Robertson’s 20% win rate, marking a critical advantage.
• Reflecting on breakpoint conversion, Robertson slightly edges out Stewart with a 38.46% conversion rate against Stewart's 34.78%, indicating a knack for seizing opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (July 31, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis match, several factors favor Stewart. Their superior performance on second serves and their consistent gameplay over the past year suggest that Stewart is a formidable opponent. They are particularly strong on I.hard surfaces and have shown greater resilience in deciding set situations, marking them as a resilient player under pressure.

Robertson’s edge lies in return game prowess, particularly against first serves, and their ability to convert breakpoints more efficiently. While these factors play a significant role, they may not outweigh Stewart's overall higher win percentage and better performance under tense match conditions.

Taking into account the blend of strengths and weaknesses, along with both players’ recent form and historical data, Stewart is projected to have the upper hand and is most likely to secure a victory in this match.